Vaccine pharmacovigilance is purposefully 3rd rate. If vax manufacturers actually had liability, that might change (though if they still had government agencies recommending their products, I still think they would lie).
The herbal products world lives in fear of the FDA, so they have found a way to carefully navigate safety, particularly from botanical adulteration. I think theirs is a model that could be applied to the pharma world, but only if the FDA actually became a neutral party.
The context of my tweet was you were repeatedly asking Morris to answer your unanswered question. But a few days ago I had asked you a question about the same dataset which you still hadn't answered, and I even reposted it on Twitter after you asked me to post it on Twitter and tag Morris, but I forgot to tag Morris the first time so I now posted it again in a thread where Morris was tagged.
I don't think your characterization of Morris as the reply guy under "tweets from high follower accounts" is accurate. He is known for his patience in writing thoughtful replies to accounts with a low number of followers. I think I had single-digit followers when he patiently showed me plots of the English data for mortality by vaccination status which made me realize the misclassification hypothesis presented by Fenton and Neil might have been wrong.
Welcome the Eagle does some good work, but I wonder if some VAERS reports are fabricated as part of some anti-vaccine psyop campaign? The management of VAERS was outsourced to General Dynamics IT in 2020, but it's the same company that was contracted by the Pentagon to run an anti-vaccine psyop campaign on social media: https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/general-dynamics-was-contracted-by.
Almost anyone reading your comment will be wondering why Jeff Morris can't speak for himself, especially given that my question was about a paper he authored and has nothing at all to do with you.
1) "Truther" is a scallywag. If anybody is hiding it's him. Noah Ruderman aka truther is easily findable on Vimeo and LinkedIn. Just another failed comedian and videographer. I won't dox him on X, but that doesn't mean I have to respect his thinly veiled pseudo persona on a platform he in not even using like substack. I don't want any physical harm to come to Noah, maybe just some honest Yelp reviews of his shitty work and in case he decides to jump on stage and crack shitty jokes again.
3) You can download all "deleted reports" from medalerts.org with absolutely everything including MedDRA. Do you need me to show you how? It sounds like you and Henjin could use it? FYI the "deleted" reports are everything Steve Rubin has published, although I know for a fact he has a couple more files from years ago he could upload and process. He's not missing any "live" data, he just wasn't exactly religious about "updating" medalerts every time he downloaded from WONDER? For this reason there is a high % of unpublished ID#'s in the sequential numeric range of 100K-150K as an example. I known Steven has at least two files he's never uploaded which would only affect what was edited and/or certain "quickly" deleted reports... As for anymore official "deleted reports" that have never been revealed by medalerts because of his couple unprocessed files, it might only net us maybe a dozen extra deleted reports from years ago and definitely before the covid plandemic.
The big % of unpublished ID# between ID#s 100k-150k is because Medalert's wasn't officially around between 1990-2002. You can read more about Steve's history at NVIC...
4) In your analysis you'll eventually get to the reports that have been deleted but then reappeared and sometimes years later! Not to guild the lily but I'll help you find my "unicorn" report now! It's a report where the victim was simple swapped out to completely different victim, completely different vax type, completely different vax date, etc.... HERE: ID# 1545028 https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/vaers-caught-fraudulently-changing
You can see all "DELETED/REAPPEARED" reports in my deleted reports dashboards and querying just the reports that were deleted on Jan 15, 2025. Goofy date I know...
5) Don't be like openvaers and not give credit where credit is due. If you are going to reference me on Twitter include me properly. I didn't even know Truther was talking shit about me until this article. While were at it maybe you can vet some of Liz's bullshit "boxes" like this: https://postimg.cc/YLwDs76m I don't think it's ethical lying, I think lame algorithms. Liz must not be using you custom LLM's. It's better these "boxes" get vetted now before some "pro-vax" attorney tears up her boxes in a front of a judge at Nuremburg 2.0
6) Anything I say about medalerts I know because I've also helped him ever so slightly and also had the honor and pleasure to have lunch with Dr. Steven Rubin in Palo Alto in 2021.
7) This is all iron sharpens iron, I think we all want this shot stopped. We may deviate after this point because some of you or them may still be pro-vaxx just not this vaxx? Whatever, I'm a proud antivaxxer and never been vaxxed in my life. IMO, if we had a true and honest pharmacovigilance system, vaccines wouldn't even be allowed to exist. Therefore I will accept RFKjr's word salad for now that he his pro-safe-vaccine. I would like to see pink flying elephants also someday that evolve naturally. God Bless
8) Morris & Ruderman are just typical pharma shills hiding behind captured peer reviewed papers IMO
(I will try and write an article about it in the future, but it will only be after I complete a lot of other analyses which is already in my backlog, some of which will in fact USE LLMs ha ha)
I apologize if you feel I haven't given you sufficient credit, these things are often unintentional. As your own President Harry Truman said "It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit."
And I agree with this of course
"This is all iron sharpens iron, I think we all want this shot stopped"
Sufficient credit and no credit are to distinct conditions. However, that does not even matter. Do you know I have a "deleted reports" dashboard? In the minutiae of all the details, I realize to may not even have all the deleted report? Be it all the deleted covid reports or the rest especially the UNK Vax type during the covid jab era. I don't really care who gets credit, but you know as well as I do Liz & Jess won't even whisper my name and that's simply about pride and ego. Beyond you, openvaers, jess and everybody else, a lot of this stuff is what I've been doing for years. The first thing I asked you when I met you or found you a couple years ago now was if you were interested in doing a "dedupping" process. Maybe it was a matter of definitions or understanding but it's basically comparing the live date to the deleted reports and deducing down to the % probability that a match(s) exist? Meaning these are duplicates or maybe what you might be finding like a duplicate but more like a follow-up add-on report? You probably don't need me for anything really except for maybe a interactive dashboard? So I'm willing to give you all the deleted reports and/or show you how to pull them down, if you don't have them. If you do have all the deleted reports or simply not interested, than I apologize for my misunderstanding. If I was interested in credit I probably would have never commented at all on this post, nor made an offer of the deleted reports. In truth I'm not all that excited about simply releasing all deleted reports, but I know it's the right thing to do for the movement, and that maybe you can do something to push the ball forward that I can not do? I'm not a AI, LLM, data whiz like you, but you are not a medical billing revenue cycle management expert like me. So please consider that your credit. You have skills I don't have and I have some knowledge you don't. Is that fair?
"If you do have all the deleted reports or simply not interested, than I apologize for my misunderstanding."
I believe you mentioned the deleted reports as a comment on some past Substack article, but no, I am pretty sure I did not receive any file(s) from you. So I am only aware of your dashboards, and till date I am not sure how to download any data from your dashboards (btw that is what I am trying to get my readers to do - download the source data and verify everything for themselves).
Also to the best of my memory I have been glad to acknowledge that you are sort of the OG of a lot of VAERS analysis and I believe I have also mentioned that I learnt a lot reading your stuff. Although yes I still complain about having to watch videos given how much time investment it takes.
[In fact I think everyone should spend the money to generate automated transcripts for all their educational videos as much as possible, especially in 2025 when it has become quite cheap and fairly accurate - for example TurboScribe allows unlimited transcriptions for $120/year]
I am quite sure I have linked to your Substack many times in my articles, and your Substack has now been on my recommended list for a long time.
Having said all that (and I believe I have mentioned this before) what I am doing as a data scientist with not much knowledge or training in medical stuff is VERY DIFFERENT and at best complementary to what you are doing.
I do data explorations without going too deep into the specifics - not because I don't want to do deep dives, but because there has been a shocking apathy towards vaccine injuries in the data science community and I want to show people just how many different types of analyses they have missed because of this neglect.
I now have over 100 articles on this Substack, so clearly my original assumption (about lack of interest in applying NLU ideas to vaccine injury datasets) was correct.
"but I know it's the right thing to do for the movement, and that maybe you can do something to push the ball forward that I can not do?"
I am not sure I understand this comment. What is wrong with releasing deleted reports? Isn't all this based on stuff that CDC has already published at some point?
Vaccine pharmacovigilance is purposefully 3rd rate. If vax manufacturers actually had liability, that might change (though if they still had government agencies recommending their products, I still think they would lie).
The herbal products world lives in fear of the FDA, so they have found a way to carefully navigate safety, particularly from botanical adulteration. I think theirs is a model that could be applied to the pharma world, but only if the FDA actually became a neutral party.
The context of my tweet was you were repeatedly asking Morris to answer your unanswered question. But a few days ago I had asked you a question about the same dataset which you still hadn't answered, and I even reposted it on Twitter after you asked me to post it on Twitter and tag Morris, but I forgot to tag Morris the first time so I now posted it again in a thread where Morris was tagged.
I don't think your characterization of Morris as the reply guy under "tweets from high follower accounts" is accurate. He is known for his patience in writing thoughtful replies to accounts with a low number of followers. I think I had single-digit followers when he patiently showed me plots of the English data for mortality by vaccination status which made me realize the misclassification hypothesis presented by Fenton and Neil might have been wrong.
Welcome the Eagle does some good work, but I wonder if some VAERS reports are fabricated as part of some anti-vaccine psyop campaign? The management of VAERS was outsourced to General Dynamics IT in 2020, but it's the same company that was contracted by the Pentagon to run an anti-vaccine psyop campaign on social media: https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/general-dynamics-was-contracted-by.
Almost anyone reading your comment will be wondering why Jeff Morris can't speak for himself, especially given that my question was about a paper he authored and has nothing at all to do with you.
But let us see how it all plays out.
1) "Truther" is a scallywag. If anybody is hiding it's him. Noah Ruderman aka truther is easily findable on Vimeo and LinkedIn. Just another failed comedian and videographer. I won't dox him on X, but that doesn't mean I have to respect his thinly veiled pseudo persona on a platform he in not even using like substack. I don't want any physical harm to come to Noah, maybe just some honest Yelp reviews of his shitty work and in case he decides to jump on stage and crack shitty jokes again.
2) Why didn't you mention my "deleted reports" dashboard? https://www.vaersaware.com/deleted-reports-2007-2022 It's the only one of it's kind and it's up to date, unlike vaersanalysis.info download. God Bless Wayne the creator of vaersanlysis.info, we did a lot of work together, he's one of the best SQL guys I know, and he even helped medalerts.org create their PRR reporting functionality.
3) You can download all "deleted reports" from medalerts.org with absolutely everything including MedDRA. Do you need me to show you how? It sounds like you and Henjin could use it? FYI the "deleted" reports are everything Steve Rubin has published, although I know for a fact he has a couple more files from years ago he could upload and process. He's not missing any "live" data, he just wasn't exactly religious about "updating" medalerts every time he downloaded from WONDER? For this reason there is a high % of unpublished ID#'s in the sequential numeric range of 100K-150K as an example. I known Steven has at least two files he's never uploaded which would only affect what was edited and/or certain "quickly" deleted reports... As for anymore official "deleted reports" that have never been revealed by medalerts because of his couple unprocessed files, it might only net us maybe a dozen extra deleted reports from years ago and definitely before the covid plandemic.
The big % of unpublished ID# between ID#s 100k-150k is because Medalert's wasn't officially around between 1990-2002. You can read more about Steve's history at NVIC...
One of these days you might get around to analyzing all the "unpublished" ID#s like I do: https://www.vaersaware.com/unpublished-reports-id-s
4) In your analysis you'll eventually get to the reports that have been deleted but then reappeared and sometimes years later! Not to guild the lily but I'll help you find my "unicorn" report now! It's a report where the victim was simple swapped out to completely different victim, completely different vax type, completely different vax date, etc.... HERE: ID# 1545028 https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/vaers-caught-fraudulently-changing
also here is an example of Deleting and "reappearing" a report: https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1275594&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON
You can see all "DELETED/REAPPEARED" reports in my deleted reports dashboards and querying just the reports that were deleted on Jan 15, 2025. Goofy date I know...
5) Don't be like openvaers and not give credit where credit is due. If you are going to reference me on Twitter include me properly. I didn't even know Truther was talking shit about me until this article. While were at it maybe you can vet some of Liz's bullshit "boxes" like this: https://postimg.cc/YLwDs76m I don't think it's ethical lying, I think lame algorithms. Liz must not be using you custom LLM's. It's better these "boxes" get vetted now before some "pro-vax" attorney tears up her boxes in a front of a judge at Nuremburg 2.0
6) Anything I say about medalerts I know because I've also helped him ever so slightly and also had the honor and pleasure to have lunch with Dr. Steven Rubin in Palo Alto in 2021.
7) This is all iron sharpens iron, I think we all want this shot stopped. We may deviate after this point because some of you or them may still be pro-vaxx just not this vaxx? Whatever, I'm a proud antivaxxer and never been vaxxed in my life. IMO, if we had a true and honest pharmacovigilance system, vaccines wouldn't even be allowed to exist. Therefore I will accept RFKjr's word salad for now that he his pro-safe-vaccine. I would like to see pink flying elephants also someday that evolve naturally. God Bless
8) Morris & Ruderman are just typical pharma shills hiding behind captured peer reviewed papers IMO
I entirely disagree with your take on LLMs
(I will try and write an article about it in the future, but it will only be after I complete a lot of other analyses which is already in my backlog, some of which will in fact USE LLMs ha ha)
I apologize if you feel I haven't given you sufficient credit, these things are often unintentional. As your own President Harry Truman said "It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit."
And I agree with this of course
"This is all iron sharpens iron, I think we all want this shot stopped"
Sufficient credit and no credit are to distinct conditions. However, that does not even matter. Do you know I have a "deleted reports" dashboard? In the minutiae of all the details, I realize to may not even have all the deleted report? Be it all the deleted covid reports or the rest especially the UNK Vax type during the covid jab era. I don't really care who gets credit, but you know as well as I do Liz & Jess won't even whisper my name and that's simply about pride and ego. Beyond you, openvaers, jess and everybody else, a lot of this stuff is what I've been doing for years. The first thing I asked you when I met you or found you a couple years ago now was if you were interested in doing a "dedupping" process. Maybe it was a matter of definitions or understanding but it's basically comparing the live date to the deleted reports and deducing down to the % probability that a match(s) exist? Meaning these are duplicates or maybe what you might be finding like a duplicate but more like a follow-up add-on report? You probably don't need me for anything really except for maybe a interactive dashboard? So I'm willing to give you all the deleted reports and/or show you how to pull them down, if you don't have them. If you do have all the deleted reports or simply not interested, than I apologize for my misunderstanding. If I was interested in credit I probably would have never commented at all on this post, nor made an offer of the deleted reports. In truth I'm not all that excited about simply releasing all deleted reports, but I know it's the right thing to do for the movement, and that maybe you can do something to push the ball forward that I can not do? I'm not a AI, LLM, data whiz like you, but you are not a medical billing revenue cycle management expert like me. So please consider that your credit. You have skills I don't have and I have some knowledge you don't. Is that fair?
"If you do have all the deleted reports or simply not interested, than I apologize for my misunderstanding."
I believe you mentioned the deleted reports as a comment on some past Substack article, but no, I am pretty sure I did not receive any file(s) from you. So I am only aware of your dashboards, and till date I am not sure how to download any data from your dashboards (btw that is what I am trying to get my readers to do - download the source data and verify everything for themselves).
Also to the best of my memory I have been glad to acknowledge that you are sort of the OG of a lot of VAERS analysis and I believe I have also mentioned that I learnt a lot reading your stuff. Although yes I still complain about having to watch videos given how much time investment it takes.
[In fact I think everyone should spend the money to generate automated transcripts for all their educational videos as much as possible, especially in 2025 when it has become quite cheap and fairly accurate - for example TurboScribe allows unlimited transcriptions for $120/year]
I am quite sure I have linked to your Substack many times in my articles, and your Substack has now been on my recommended list for a long time.
Having said all that (and I believe I have mentioned this before) what I am doing as a data scientist with not much knowledge or training in medical stuff is VERY DIFFERENT and at best complementary to what you are doing.
I do data explorations without going too deep into the specifics - not because I don't want to do deep dives, but because there has been a shocking apathy towards vaccine injuries in the data science community and I want to show people just how many different types of analyses they have missed because of this neglect.
I now have over 100 articles on this Substack, so clearly my original assumption (about lack of interest in applying NLU ideas to vaccine injury datasets) was correct.
"but I know it's the right thing to do for the movement, and that maybe you can do something to push the ball forward that I can not do?"
I am not sure I understand this comment. What is wrong with releasing deleted reports? Isn't all this based on stuff that CDC has already published at some point?