Great article Aravind, I might add a couple more visuals on my soon to be published dashboard because of this article. There were at least ~446 symptoms of "death" not including the other flavors like sudden death, foetal death, brain death, etc..
One over arching sentiment not generally mentioned or elaborated upon here is that vsafe was not designed to be auto crosswalked into VAERS. Since only ~36K reports in VAERS show an association with Vsafe we can effectively say these are two independent sets of victims, VAERS vs Vsafe. If Vsafe had not been created, how many more reports might have been submitted to VAERS? In my opinion Vsafe was created to run interference on VAERS. Vaccines are highly toxic doggy doo-doo mixed in with some less toxic doo-doo to kill you slowly and/or shorten you life IMO.
A few things Aravind. I thought you could maybe get a small workaround by stepping through the entry lines. For any given registrant stepping through in order would at least maybe give progression. However, reading your post, I hadnt calculated the full number of checkins! Which is way larger than i had thought and explains the repeats. Sore throat, still sore, sore throat. In consecutive order. No way to know what the time frame is.
I didnt understand where ICAN got the 24-48 hours from. I was going to delve into that today, now I am sending them your article with a question.
My question is the following: in no case that i can find is there an SD and SRO both filled in. Its either one or the other. Do you have any idea why this would be the case? Do you think people were using them interchangeably? This is even true for multiple checkins… 3 might be SRO but then a fourth SD and no SRO.
Zoom in and read the dates on the first page (Previous Activity) of the sample data PDF I linked above.
I think looking at the actual dates relative to initial check-in is very helpful if you want to get an overview of how the timeline works.
Whoever filled out those v-safe surveys was clearly very diligent w.r.t doing things on time, which just makes the whole thing even sadder when you reflect on it. :-(
Will when i get to my computer. The whole thing is sad. The incompetence is shocking. Repeatedly. Really makes me wonder about unrelated governmental systems.
Yes, it has only null values at the moment, because the Weekly and Monthly checkins are not yet included in that giant file. At least that's what I think till now.
A heartfelt thank you for your hard work.
Great article Aravind, I might add a couple more visuals on my soon to be published dashboard because of this article. There were at least ~446 symptoms of "death" not including the other flavors like sudden death, foetal death, brain death, etc..
One over arching sentiment not generally mentioned or elaborated upon here is that vsafe was not designed to be auto crosswalked into VAERS. Since only ~36K reports in VAERS show an association with Vsafe we can effectively say these are two independent sets of victims, VAERS vs Vsafe. If Vsafe had not been created, how many more reports might have been submitted to VAERS? In my opinion Vsafe was created to run interference on VAERS. Vaccines are highly toxic doggy doo-doo mixed in with some less toxic doo-doo to kill you slowly and/or shorten you life IMO.
Work in progress:
https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/alberto.benavidez/viz/Vsafe/Dashboard
A few things Aravind. I thought you could maybe get a small workaround by stepping through the entry lines. For any given registrant stepping through in order would at least maybe give progression. However, reading your post, I hadnt calculated the full number of checkins! Which is way larger than i had thought and explains the repeats. Sore throat, still sore, sore throat. In consecutive order. No way to know what the time frame is.
I didnt understand where ICAN got the 24-48 hours from. I was going to delve into that today, now I am sending them your article with a question.
My question is the following: in no case that i can find is there an SD and SRO both filled in. Its either one or the other. Do you have any idea why this would be the case? Do you think people were using them interchangeably? This is even true for multiple checkins… 3 might be SRO but then a fourth SD and no SRO.
You can explain this by looking at the screenshots in the sample data from Aaron Siri's article:
https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/v-safe-documentation_Redacted-01.pdf
combined with point 4 from my article.
Days 0 - 7 have free text option only for SYSTEMIC_REACTION_OTHER, while all checkins after that have free text only for SYMPTOM_DESCRIPTION.
So a given row in the Interim Release 1 CSV file should never have both SD and SRO filled in.
So not 14 days, 7 days and then they switch? Interesting.
Zoom in and read the dates on the first page (Previous Activity) of the sample data PDF I linked above.
I think looking at the actual dates relative to initial check-in is very helpful if you want to get an overview of how the timeline works.
Whoever filled out those v-safe surveys was clearly very diligent w.r.t doing things on time, which just makes the whole thing even sadder when you reflect on it. :-(
Will when i get to my computer. The whole thing is sad. The incompetence is shocking. Repeatedly. Really makes me wonder about unrelated governmental systems.
someone stated last week 'everything the government touches falls apart' I think that is very accurate
#11 .. "and that field has not yet been published..."
Isn't this table in the big "check-in" file (column R)? If the column is populated or sparsely populated is another question...
Yes, it has only null values at the moment, because the Weekly and Monthly checkins are not yet included in that giant file. At least that's what I think till now.
At least 174K think vax caused issues...: https://imgur.com/gallery/Jz1LPOe
There is a few in check-in file. I'll have the stats when I do my big reveal...
https://imgur.com/gallery/Ewl90Ii