3 Comments
Apr 10Liked by Aravind Mohanoor

While I see your reason for calculating the data in this manner and showing that it is still worse than it should be, I feel this is not an accurate reflection of actual v injuries. Recently I have been reviewing in my mind, the amount of people that suddenly died in the last 3 years of heart attacks or rare blood cancer or ? and I have more than expected on my list. It is only in reflection that I realize that these lost family and friends could have been v injured. Who is reporting for them? Since the very real "side effect" of myocarditis has been all but hidden in mainstream communications, how would people, a year later, even know that it could have been? Or rare cancers? The further in time we move away from the date someone got J*bbed, the less likely they are to associate it in their own mind with the V. As we know from Steve Kirsch's work and others, the percentage of MRNA V injury goes UP over time (beyond say 48 hours), not down as would be typical of other (non-MRNA) V injuries. The ACTUAL percentages of V injury may not be known for 10 years, as people develop health issues over time due to the spike protein inflammation.

Expand full comment

I was wondering if you noticed in ICAN's dashboard under "health impact" visual they are reporting 751,947 people needed care (Telehealth, urgent care, ER, or hospitalization)?

I am not seeing these descriptors under "health impact"? I'm wondering if ICAN did some custom correlations and created these four summarized descriptors? Do you see them in downloadable data?

Also I was wondering if you concur with my assertion there are actually ~173K child or adolescents dependents under the care of adult? This can be seen filtering on the "relationship" field. ICAN has never acknowledge this fact, nor do they include the "relationship" filter on their dashboard. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Nevermind I found it. Will be updating my VSAFE dashboard soon.

Expand full comment