Yes. Similar but in the same vein. The basic object is reasonably matching all deleted reports to published reports. As you know the two conditions VAERS can ethically “delete” reports after publication is for fake/false and or duplicate reports. Keep in mind that VAERS has up to 4-6wks to rigorously authenticate incoming submissions and request additional records if needed to adjudicate a report before publication. With that they still have a need to delete 25,644 reports to date including 680 death reports. I’ve manually spot checked about 2K reports over time and could not find even 10% (~200 reports) that could be considered a match or even a reasonable match. A death deletion I refer to routinely is a ~31 female died in Maine back in ~June 2021. In the live data there is not even a 31yr old female that has died in Maine at all? I’ve heard someone else tell me this type of matching was called a “de-duping” process. Most medical systems I’ve worked out of have this type of feature built in with an additional merging feature as duplicate patient medical records is the bane of every doctors existence it seems. Every doctor has about thirty different patients named Maria Hernandez, at least in my neck of the woods. Lol
I’m the only entity in the world that has a complete set of all deleted c19 jab reports (25,644). The next objective would be to determine based on reasonable matches over many fields, which deleted reports have a reasonably matching counterpart in the live data? Which has absolutely no match and is also considered a strong candidate for being a genuine sincere honest report, based on being submitted by a “contactable physician or HCW” and/or other criteria. I’m already in discussions with some VIP’s who are very interested in this project and might even be willing to fund the project or at least pay the right people or person to get the job done. If you think you have the skill set for this project, please reach out. If not for any reason no worries. You’ll see it on the news. God Bless
As I mentioned before I am not going to join any of the teams as this issue is too politicized now and I want to maintain my independence to do whatever analysis I want :-)
Also, you should probably get in touch with Paul Thacker once your team has been able to prove your results.
Yes. Similar but in the same vein. The basic object is reasonably matching all deleted reports to published reports. As you know the two conditions VAERS can ethically “delete” reports after publication is for fake/false and or duplicate reports. Keep in mind that VAERS has up to 4-6wks to rigorously authenticate incoming submissions and request additional records if needed to adjudicate a report before publication. With that they still have a need to delete 25,644 reports to date including 680 death reports. I’ve manually spot checked about 2K reports over time and could not find even 10% (~200 reports) that could be considered a match or even a reasonable match. A death deletion I refer to routinely is a ~31 female died in Maine back in ~June 2021. In the live data there is not even a 31yr old female that has died in Maine at all? I’ve heard someone else tell me this type of matching was called a “de-duping” process. Most medical systems I’ve worked out of have this type of feature built in with an additional merging feature as duplicate patient medical records is the bane of every doctors existence it seems. Every doctor has about thirty different patients named Maria Hernandez, at least in my neck of the woods. Lol
I’m the only entity in the world that has a complete set of all deleted c19 jab reports (25,644). The next objective would be to determine based on reasonable matches over many fields, which deleted reports have a reasonably matching counterpart in the live data? Which has absolutely no match and is also considered a strong candidate for being a genuine sincere honest report, based on being submitted by a “contactable physician or HCW” and/or other criteria. I’m already in discussions with some VIP’s who are very interested in this project and might even be willing to fund the project or at least pay the right people or person to get the job done. If you think you have the skill set for this project, please reach out. If not for any reason no worries. You’ll see it on the news. God Bless
https://www.vaersaware.com/deleted-reports-2007-2022
As I mentioned before I am not going to join any of the teams as this issue is too politicized now and I want to maintain my independence to do whatever analysis I want :-)
Also, you should probably get in touch with Paul Thacker once your team has been able to prove your results.
He is on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/thackerpd