Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gary Hawkins's avatar

As Aravind pointed out, her 306 reports they labeled "batshit crazy" are not all 100% crazy when one reads the full writeups but just assuming they ALL are, with ~1.46 million reports of harm from a covid vaccine, there are a whopping 4,777 she could not criticize for every 1 of her 306.

On another note, the scientist in the video has successfully shown that CDC's 50 employees (I recall reading that somewhere) who are vetting reports are sleepy. Or perhaps were told to leave those reports in there to make the system criticizable? Personally as director of the CDC, I would set them aside in a separate file publicly available labeled "Questionable and/or Batshit Crazy".

Since they often DO delete reports, so long as the 306 remain in place, allowing the system to be mocked, those sit as ongoing indication that CDC is in wilful violation of its duty in the 1986 VAERS law "to achieve optimal prevention against adverse reactions to vaccines".

You can see the delight in her emotions as she picked 4 favorites of the 12 pranks involving a penis out of the 306 as her way of devalidating the 1.4 million destroyed lives, unless that was all just a parody skit to make the critics of VAERS look silly, which would not be very nice.

Expand full comment
Closed VAERS's avatar

Great great article! Now I have a quick link to slap the kool-aid drinkers with, when they point to the "Hulk" and snake bite and "bent penis" reports! There is another "type" of report that seems to discredit VAERS and used by the kool-aid drinkers. These reports will say "I saw on social media" hundreds of people died or have myocarditis. Basically there are some people but very few in the grand picture that have filed a report based on something they saw in the "news". I have seen two other reports filed against my Alaskan Baby death report that was never published story as a direct example. See here: https://www.vaersaware.com/post/this-is-the-most-infamous-deleted-vaers-report-of-all-24-000-deleted-reports . There was a spot in this piece where you mention "false positives", which was great! So much philosophy and logic in those two words that industries have sprung up around it and in the context we are using it here. Unsupervised Extraction of Diagnosis Codes from EMRs Using Knowledge-Based and Extractive Text Summarization Techniques is such an endeavor and beaten path: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524149/. Speaking of "false positives" have you noticed how much the "myocarditis red box" has come down in OpenVAERS? I'm talking above and beyond from the supposed lose of "signal" from the foreign data scrubbing. An additional ~9K have been corrected because of this "false positive" you speak of. I have lamented for over three months these openvaers myocarditis stats and any stats Liz produces that rely on data "extraction" from the summary narrative and I finally called her and Rose to task and behind the scenes with all the VIP's in the email thread audience. This was my original exchange with Liz when I questioned how she was arriving at her then 52K myocarditis reports? https://i.imgur.com/22P2JcR.jpg

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts